| Generator: | freeblog.hu |
| Docs: | http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification |
Sodi!
Te, szánalmas vagy.
Én már azzal is elégedett vagyok, hogy a pride.hu-n ilyenekre figyelmeztetik a vonulókat, hogy olyan cipőben gyere amiben jól tudsz futni, a rendezvény végén azonnal indulj a kisföldalattihoz stb...
fixpont: Ott az apró irónia címke :)
Subsequently, Dianetics has achieved no general acceptance as a bona fide scientific theory. Many scientists have described Dianetics as a classic example of pseudoscience.
Few scientific investigations into the effectiveness of Dianetics have been published. Professor John A. Lee states in his 1970 evaluation of Dianetics:
Objective experimental verification of Hubbard's physiological and psychological doctrines is lacking. To date, no regular scientific agency has established the validity of his theories of prenatal perception and engrams, or cellular memory, or Dianetic reverie, or the effects of Scientology auditing routines. Existing knowledge contradicts Hubbard's theory of recording of perceptions during periods of unconsciousness.
The MEDLINE database records two independent scientific studies on Dianetics, both conducted in the 1950s under the auspices of New York University. Harvey Jay Fischer tested Dianetics therapy against three claims made by proponents and found it does not affect any significant changes in intellectual functioning, mathematical ability, or the degree of personality conflicts; Jack Fox tested Hubbard's thesis regarding recall of engrams, with the assistance of the Dianetic Research Foundation, and could not substantiate it.
Ehhez sem kell tobb hozzafuzni valo.
na, mi lesz itt? nagy szélsőjobb-szcientológus összeborulás? Szóda: Blogadmin mutatta meg neked a hubbardi utat?;)
Roniboy mint vegso erv? Ez az utobbi hetek fenyeben mondjuk nem egy meglepo fordulat....